Calculate like a valuer
Choose the method and the data, calculate, draw a conclusion – and see where the formula has its limits.
Rolandas Rakštys · Lecturer · Vytautas Magnus University, Agriculture Academy · Faculty of Bioeconomy Development, Department of Business and Rural Development · [email protected] · ORCID 0000-0003-0299-9930
Chapter 1 “Foundations of Business Value”, section 1.2 · English translation of v0.16.5 (2026-10-15) · trainer v1.0.2 · 6 parts · ≈ 53 min
Rakštys, R. (2026). Chapter 1. Foundations of Business Value (English translation of v0.16.5, 2026-10-15). Verslo planavimas ir vertinimas [Business planning and evaluation]. Vytautas Magnus University, Agriculture Academy. https://rakstys.eu/studijos/verslo-planavimas-ir-vertinimas/en/skyriai/ch01/ · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Choose a formula
What are these five years of cash flows worth today?
| Year | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFt, EUR thousand | 100 | 110 | 121 | 133 | 146 |
How do you calculate what these cash flows are worth today?
Select the cards needed for the first term of formula (1.1)
Calculate the term for year 4
What does EUR 454.2 thousand mean?
How does the discount rate change the value?
Choose WACC:
What is the period after five years worth?
How do you calculate TV?
What is needed to calculate TV₅?
Calculate TV₅
five years (PV)
terminal value (TV₅)
How do you get the value of the company today (V₀)?
You have the PV of five years of cash flows (454.2) and TV (1 861.5).
TV makes up 71.8 % of the value of the company. What does that mean?
What happens when growth approaches the rate?
WACC = 10 %. Choose the growth rate g:
- TV₅
- 1 861.5
- V₀
- 1 610.1
- TV share of value
- 71.8 %
Does the company create value?
How do you calculate EVA?
What is needed to calculate EVA?
Calculate EVA, EUR thousand
EVA is EUR 50 thousand. What does that mean?
And if NOPAT were EUR 120 thousand?
NOPAT is EUR 120 thousand; everything else is unchanged. Which statement is correct?
Creating or destroying – what does it depend on?
- IC
- 1 500
- IC × WACC
- 150
- EVA
- 50
EVA compares NOPAT with the cost of capital, so the answer also depends on which WACC is applied.
What does the company’s capital cost?
How do you calculate WACC?
What is needed to calculate WACC?
Calculate the debt term, %
WACC is 8.9 %. What does that mean?
How much does the cost of equity matter?
- Equity term
- 7.2 %
- Debt term
- 1.66 %
WACC is a discount rate, and small changes in the discount rate can generate large changes in valuation. You saw how the rate changes value at the end of part (1.1). More on sensitivity: section 1.1.5 ↗
Is value a single number?
Select the dimensions of the vector Xₜ
Which dimensions of the vector does DCF value?
What does the equation Xt+1 = G(Xt, at, εt+1) show?
What does Ω mean in formula (1.7)?
How does the loop Vt ↔ Et ↔ Dt move?
Why can formulas (1.5)–(1.8) not be calculated in the way DCF can?
See how value moves
Since all the models depend on assumptions, sensitivity analysis is indispensable: a valuation result is presented as a range with its assumptions, not as a single “exact” figure.
What is the company worth – exactly 1 610?
Click the cells and compare them with the base case
Values in EUR thousand; the table from section 1.2 of the chapter (FCF EUR 100–146 thousand). The frame marks the base case.
In which cell of the table is value highest?
When WACC falls by 1 percentage point, value rises by 14.9 %; when it rises, value falls by only 11.6 %. Why?
How many times greater is the highest value in the table than the lowest?
How should the valuation result be presented?
Why does the chapter call the DCF result not so much an “answer” as a “sensitivity range”?
References
Phelan, S. E. (1997). Exposing the Illusion of Confidence in Financial Analysis. Management Decision, 35(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749710160322
Figures and concepts are taken from the numerical examples in section 1.2 of Chapter 1, from section 1.1.2 and from the textbook’s glossary (PV, discount rate, FCF, EVA, NOPAT, WACC, exogenous and endogenous, reflexivity).
Rakštys, R. (2026). Chapter 1. Foundations of Business Value (English translation of v0.16.5, 2026-10-15). Verslo planavimas ir vertinimas [Business planning and evaluation]. Vytautas Magnus University, Agriculture Academy. https://rakstys.eu/studijos/verslo-planavimas-ir-vertinimas/en/skyriai/ch01/ · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
These slides are based on the textbook Verslo planavimas ir vertinimas [Business Planning and Evaluation]. The text was translated, structured and visually laid out with the help of artificial intelligence tools (Claude), following the protocol for working with AI and the verification procedures set by the author.